Mueller prosecutors rebuked repeatedly by trial judge with a history of colorful rulings

The federal judge presiding over the fraud trial of ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort rebuked Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team repeatedly on Tuesday, highlighting potential vulnerabilities in the first prosecution arising out of Mueller’s ongoing Russia probe.

The 78-year-old Reagan-appointed judge, T.S. Ellis, sent jurors out of the courtroom several times as he reminded prosecutors that Manafort is not on trial for simply having a “lavish lifestyle.”

Ellis also surprised the courtroom late Tuesday when he said, “I’m hoping to finish this case much sooner than anyone predicted.”

The trial had been expected to last three weeks. Earlier in the day, prosecutors told the judge they thought the government could wrap its case by the end of next week.

Prosecutors have introduced a bevy of exhibits and are in the process of calling several witnesses as part of their effort to paint Manafort as a tax scofflaw who failed to report money spent on luxury items —  then lied to get bank loans when his foreign consulting work dried up iPad Safari file.

But the Mueller team was rebuffed by Ellis when it tried to introduce photos of Manafort’s closets, filled with suits and other high-end articles of clothing. Ellis noted that those photos would eventually become fodder for the media, and called them “unnecessary” for jurors to see.

“Enough is enough. We don’t convict people because they have a lot of money and throw it around,” he said. 

This courtroom sketch depicts Paul Manafort, seated right row second from right, together with his lawyers, the jury, seated left, and the U.S <a class=Incheon Airport. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III, back center, listening to Assistant U.S. Attorney Uzo Asonye, standing, during opening arguments in the trial of President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman Manafort's on tax evasion and bank fraud charges. (Dana Verkouteren via AP)"/>

This courtroom sketch depicts Paul Manafort, seated right row second from right, together with his lawyers, the jury, seated left, and the U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III, back center, listening to Assistant U.S. Attorney Uzo Asonye, standing, during opening arguments in the trial of President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Manafort’s on tax evasion and bank fraud charges 다크소울3 다운로드.


He also dismissed an exhibit related to Manafort’s lavish spending: “All this document shows is that Mr. Manafort had a lavish lifestyle,” Ellis said. “It isn’t relevant.”

The legal standard for excluding evidence based on irrelevance or the risk of prejudicing jurors is high — ordinarily, judges only prevent jurors from seeing evidence that has no tendency to make any fact at issue in the case more or less likely, or that would pose a substantial risk of unfairly arousing juror bias. 

The prosecution was able to present some evidence of Manafort’s spending. One witness, Ron Wall, the chief financial officer of high-end men’s apparel store House of Bijan in Beverly Hills, Calif., testified that Manafort spent a grand total of $334,325 over a three-year period at the store 리눅스 터미널 파일 다운로드.

That included one invoice for an assortment of clothing in 2010, at a total of roughly $128,000. Wall testified that most of those payments came from wire transfers from banks in Cyprus — but he admitted on cross-examination by defense attorneys that he has other clients who similarly use wire transfers for costly items.

Another witness, Steve Jacobson, a contractor hired by Manafort from 2010 to 2014, said he worked on a number of the defendant’s properties, including one in Trump Tower. That is the first time jurors heard Trump’s name uttered in the trial.

Jacobson said most of the nearly $3,3 million Manafort paid him in that period came by way of international wire transfers.  The parties also stipulated that a payment for daughter Andrea’s house in Arlington came in the form of a $1.9 million wire transfer from a Cyprus bank to the limitless repup.

Among his other rebukes, Ellis on Tuesday told prosecutors to stop using the word “oligarch” to describe wealthy Ukrainians, whose dealings with Manafort are at the heart of the fraud charges he faces in the northern Virginia federal court. He said the term is a “pejorative” that would risk unfairly prejudicing jurors against Manafort.

More witnesses are scheduled in the case, who appear ready to testify about Manafort’s spending habits. Ellis’ decisionmaking casts into doubt how much of that testimony will be heard by jurors, or what instructions jurors will get on how to consider this testimony 학교 2017 다운로드.


In a surprising moment, prosecutor Uso Asonye told Ellis that Rick Gates — Manafort’s former business partner who had been considered a potential star witness for the prosecution — might not be called to the stand after all.

“Enough is enough. We don’t convict people because they have a lot of money and throw it around.”

– U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis

“He may testify, he may not,” Asonye informed Ellis, saying Mueller’s team would make the call depending on the evidence presented 28일 다운로드.

That disclosure prompted reporters to hustle out of the courtroom to report the news — “scurry[ing] out of here like rats out of a sinking ship,” Ellis said.

“You know who you are going to call,” Ellis sharply told Asonye. “If you are going to call him, then this [debate over a particular exhibit] is a waste of time.”

During opening arguments Monday, the defense team made it clear they intend to blame Gates, who handled some day-to-day business operations for Manafort, for many of the alleged reporting deficiencies Manafort is charged with.

Security personnel from the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Protective Service, watch the vicinity around the Alexandria Federal Court in Alexandria, Va., on day one of Paul Manafort's trial, Tuesday, July 31, 2018 <a class=sql server 2012 express 다운로드. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)"/>

DHS guards stand watch on Monday outside the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Va.


Ellis interjected during the prosecutors’ opening statement to remind jurors that wealth alone is not criminal, and he rebuked a prosecutor in front of the jury for saying that the “evidence will show” Manafort’s guilt.

“It isn’t a crime to have a lot of money and be profligate in your spending,” Ellis said.

Jurors also heard Monday that Manafort bought an ostrich jacket worth more than $15,000. That prompted Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), to issue a statement calling for Manafort to turn over the jacket, which was “likely made from numerous juvenile ostriches whose throats were slit and whose feathers were plucked out.”

Ellis had harshly admonished members of Mueller’s team in a tense preliminary hearing in May, saying they “don’t care” about Manafort and were pursuing the case against the 69-year-old ex-Trump adviser only as a means of targeting the president 알파사파이어 다운로드.

Ellis has issued tough — sometimes colorful — rulings against the defense during the Manafort case, as well. The judge, who took senior status more than a decade ago but continues to hear a limited docket, seemed to grow impatient on Tuesday after being told that attorneys on both sides were seen rolling their eyes in response to his rulings or after stepping back from the bench.


The lawyers’ facial expressions, Ellis said, appeared to show them thinking, “Why do we have to put up with this idiot judge?”

Earlier this month, Ellis denied a defense motion to move the trial further from Washington, D.C., rejecting Manafort’s argument that media coverage in the major market would risk biasing the jury.

“The mere fact that a case has drawn substantial media attention does not, by itself, warrant a change in venue,” Ellis wrote in denying the request 안드로이드 zip 파일 다운로드.

Separately, Ellis also excoriated the defense team earlier this month for opposing Manafort’s transfer to an Alexandria, Va., jail — shortly after complaining that the jail at which he was housed was also inadequate.

“Defense counsel has not identified any general or specific threat to defendant’s safety at the Alexandria Detention Center,” Ellis wrote. “They have not done so, because the professionals at the Alexandria Detention Center are very familiar with housing high-profile defendants including foreign and domestic terrorists, spies and traitors.”

He continued, “It is surprising and confusing when counsel identifies a problem and then opposes the most logical solution to that problem.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Gregg Re is an editor for Fox News. Follow him on Twitter @gregg_re.

Related Posts

About The Author